THE UPWARD CALL
Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but this is my one aim:
to forget everything that's behind, and to strain every nerve to go after what lies ahead.
I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God
IN KING JESUS.
by – Stuart H. Pouliot
April 1, 2019
Jesus — Christ and King!
It is not unusual to read commentary or books about our Lord in which the word Christ is used almost to
the exclusion of our Lord's personal name Jesus , standing alone. If Jesus is referred to, it is almost always
joined with the word Christ as in Jesus Christ or Christ Jesus . I have done this as well. It seems that
references to King Jesus in lieu of Christ Jesus , or Jesus the King in lieu of Jesus Christ are not very popular.
Scripture does not give us much help in this regard either. In spite of this, I want to make the case for
injecting more references to King Jesus in my writings in lieu of Christ Jesus (or, its reverse counterpart).
To be clear, the word Christ or its combination with the name Jesus is very, if not extremely, scriptural,
especially in Paul's epistles. Further, the word Christ by itself has no counterpart in our modern world,
making it a rather unique word that only Christians own. But what does it mean? As I am writing this, a
new thought has come to me. Perhaps the best way to view Christ is that it signifies the summing up of
the fulfillment of the law, the prophets, and the psalms (Luke 24:44), which speaks to all that Israel was
looking for and, specially, to the coming of the kingdom of the heavens and its king. Jesus was the
fulfillment of all of this and more in His first arrival. So, perhaps, the term Christ points to all of this.
Great thought; but this raises a question: Does the term Christ lead one to a more personal relationship
with our beloved, or does it make one look upon Him in sort of a static, religious, even institutional way?
The answer for me is "no" to the first part, and "yes" to the second part. My heart continually strives for
it to be the reverse and desires this to be projected in my writings as well. In other words, I desire an
approach that leads to a greater relationship with our beloved and away from a static, religious,
institutional mindset. If my writings produce something other than this, then there is no reason for me to
write. Above all else, I desire that people come to know the person of Jesus as their very own life, the one
I often say is the lover of our life (from Jesus' perspective), as well as the one who must be the love of our
life (from our perspective).
So, let's look at Christ . Depending on the translation, Christ appears 500-plus times, either by itself or
joined with the name Jesus , ordered two ways ( Jesus Christ or Christ Jesus ). A few translations have opted
to use the words Messiah or anointed , and, in a rare but refreshing case, King .
Here is the challenge: without explanation, the word Christ is simply a word to most (and abused by many),
which can lead to misunderstandings. Case in point: I met a person once that thought Christ, as in Jesus
Christ , was Jesus' surname; without doubt, there are others out there with the same confusion. When it
appears in reverse, Christ Jesus , well, that creates a whole other level of bewilderment. We trust that
these are exceptions, but I wonder. I know this is a personal issue, but after a while the word Christ takes
on a heavy, religious tone—a word theologians and preachers use. So, what does Christ mean?
Strong's Concordance tells us, in Hebrew, the word mashiyach means anointed ; usually a consecrated
person (as a king, priest, or saint); specifically, the Messiah: - anointed, Messiah. Again, Strong says that,
in Greek, the word christos means anointed, that is, the Messiah, an epithet of Jesus—Christ. An epithet
is a "descriptive name or title applied to a person." Thus, the word Christ is a title with a specific meaning
Jesus — Christ and King!
attached to it—in this case, the meaning refers to "being anointed", which, in turn, means consecrated or
"set apart as holy, for a specific purpose." Given these definitions, some translations use Messiah entirely
in the place of Christ ; others use Anointed ; yet others mix it up a bit, using both.
All of this makes perfect sense when speaking or writing of our Lord Jesus. He is the Messiah, specifically
the Messiah of Israel, the one the ancient prophets announced would come to deliver or rescue Israel.
And, by the way, He did so in His first or inaugural manifestation to humanity. Israel is now called the new
creation (Galatians 6:15-16), which is the called-out body of Jesus made up of descendants of Abraham
and non-descendants from among the nations. But even the word Messiah requires some explanation for
the novice, especially one with no Hebrew background. After all, how would a so-called gentile (non-Jew)
know anything about a messiah, let alone expect one to arrive on the stage of world history? (I prefer the
word nations over gentiles ; but I use it here because it has a general understanding to people, especially
for those with a Judeo-Christian worldview.)
The same challenge applies to "anointing"; this also requires some level of explanation to the novice,
especially the gentile. At best, it means that Jesus is someone special who is set apart from others for a
very specific purpose—in this case, God's purpose. Of course, there is some abuse of this word in certain
quarters of Christian teaching where the "anointed ones" are those who hold down a pulpit week after
week. "Touch not the anointed" is the warning. I know this one from personal experience.
Now, using the word messiah or anointed with the name Jesus , or simply presenting these as standalones,
helps to clear up some confusion or, at least, to direct the emphasis to an epithet and not a surname.
However, there is one title that I believe rises above these epithets. It is king . Calling our Lord King Jesus
provides a clarity that the word Christ does not. When one hears the word king , it should immediately
form an image that the one holding the title has a level of authority and power that most do not have. In
this regard, I find N.T. Wright's Kingdom New Testament—A Contemporary Translation very refreshing
because he mixes up the word Christ quite a bit by incorporating Messiah or King in its place. In fact, he
generously refers to Jesus as king or King Jesus .
My point is this: I prefer to mix it up a bit as well, and I have begun to do this in my writings, especially in
referring to our Lord as king instead of Christ. Further, when appropriate, I will bypass all the titles and
simply refer to our Lord in the personal as Jesus . I won't belabor the point; I trust most understand what
I am saying. Keep in mind that the question at hand is only in regard to the word Christ and replacements
for it. There are many other epithets that are available to describe our Lord Jesus, such as Son of God, Son
of man, the last Adam, the second man, the Savior, the Lamb, etc. Depending on the subject, I try to
incorporate these and more into what I write as well.
Bottom-line: I don't know about you, but the name Jesus speaks to my heart relationally. Of course, let us
not forget that tracing the word Jesus or Yeshua back to its Hebrew root words signifies savior, deliverer,
rescuer, preserver, victor. Jesus is all of these, and more, to each and every one of us in a very personal
way. We might not understand all His epithets, but adding the title king to Jesus' name should bring great
comfort to our hearts, knowing such a one rules over all of creation and is the ruler of the kings of the
earth—today, not way off in the future; especially as we see all that is going on in the world. Even greater
than this, at the standalone name of Jesus , our hearts should leap with joy, for He has loved us by laying
down His life for us, and this love has never diminished, nor will it ever! God is love , and we know God's
love in and through the one called Jesus , the Son of God's love! He is King Jesus, and we have been called
into His kingdom of love and glory. This is good news!