THE UPWARD CALL
Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet;
but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead,
I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God
IN CHRIST JESUS.
(Philippians 3:13-14 NASB)
Seated in the Chair of Moses #2
August 22, 2009
(1) Then Jesus spoke to the crowds and to His disciples, (2) saying: “The scribes and the
Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; (3) therefore all that they tell
you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do
not do them. (4) They tie up heavy burdens and lay them on men’s shoulders, but they
themselves are unwilling to move them with so much as a finger. (5) But they do all their
deeds to be noticed by men; for they broaden their phylacteries and lengthen the tassels
of their garments. (6) They love the place of honor at banquets and the chief seats in the
synagogues, (7) and respectful greetings in the market places, and being called Rabbi by
men. (8) But do not be called Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers. (9)
Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. (10)
Do not be called leaders; for One is your Leader, that is, Christ. (11) But the greatest
among you shall be your servant. (12) Whoever exalts himself shall be humbled; and
whoever humbles himself shall be exalted. (Matthew 23:1-12 NASB)
As stated in the first issue of this series, while recently reading the above verses, I was struck by how
similar the political leaders of our day are to the scribes and Pharisees of Jesus’ day when He walked
this earth 2,000 years ago. I will explain why (in the next issue), but before I do, I have a few more
points to make.
I must emphasize that the moral condition of the present political system is a reflection of that of the
general population, and the moral condition of the general population is a reflection of that of the so-
called church, and the moral condition of the organized church-at-large is a reflection of that of its
leadership, especially of those who have usurped the Headship of Christ.
Please see issue #03-0936, March 4, 2009, The Ecclesia Within the Church , for an explanation of the
terms “church-at-large,” “organized church,” and “so-called church,” as well as issues #02-0864
through #02-0866, November 2008, Do Not Be Called ; and #02-0867, November 25, 2008, Head
Over All, To the Ecclesia .
Simply, if we believe that we, as the Lord’s people, are to be the salt of the earth and the light of the
world (Matthew 5:13-14), then we must assume some responsibility for the moral condition of our
government and its leaders. This responsibility is particularly acute when we consider that at least 70%
of Americans claim to be Christians. Given such a high percentage, we should be the moral compass for
our country. If we are not the moral compass, then the government will drift toward tyranny or anarchy.
Or, if our compass goes in the wrong direction, then the government of our country will go in the wrong
direction, whatever that might be, which, most likely, will lead to either tyranny or anarchy as well.
The term moral compass , in the positive sense, refers to moral excellence or virtue .
Please see issue #03-09128, June 3, 2009, Moral Excellence and Intelligence ; along with issues #03-
0902, January 5, 2009, Babylonian Leaders Are Smart ; and #03-09116, April 24, 2009, The Meek
Inherit the Earth .
The Founding Fathers of the United States of America believed that, without virtue, the republic that
they formed could not survive. Benjamin Franklin wrote: “Only a virtuous people are capable of
freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”
This should be an eye-opener to us Americans as we consider that our president has appointed, without
Congressional oversight, over 40 czars (his term) to oversee certain areas of American life. How many
masters do we have trying to intrude into our God-given unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness?
Later, George Washington, in his praise of the US Constitution, stated that its survival depended on
“virtue in the body of the people.”
I would sum up the Founding Fathers’ concept of virtue to be akin to laying down our lives for one
We know love by this, that He laid down His life for us; and we ought to lay down our
lives for the brethren. (1 John 3:16 NASB)
They did not directly inject Jesus into their idea of virtue, but they saw the individual sacrificing his
private interest for the good of the community, which is called public virtue . This is akin to Jesus’
And the second is like it: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Lev. 19:18 (Matthew
Some might ask: Isn’t this some form of socialism? Definitely not!
Public virtue is only one component of our truly unique government that was designed as a republic and
formalized by a constitution in 1787-1788. In fact, without using the term socialism , Samuel Adams
believed that they had developed a way that was anything but socialism, and, if such a system were
implemented, it would be unconstitutional.
Contrary to revisionists of history, some of the Founding Fathers also believed that morality and
religion were indispensable supports of the political system. George Washington believed that morality
is not possible without religion, and that national morality cannot prevail if religious principles are
Consider this wisdom in light of the politically correct wisdom of our courts that began to throw God
out of the schools and public life back in the 1960’s, all in the name of a faulty interpretation of the US
Constitution called “separation of church and state.”
John Adams stated: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.”
Well, this discussion could go on for quite some time, but I must leave it, or I will never get to my point.
If you are interested in an easy-to-read historical exposition of these issues, I highly recommend the
book A Miracle That Changed the World: The 5000 Year Leap , by W. Cleon Skousen, National Center
for Constitutional Studies, 1981. It is not a revision of history; it is a look at a miracle of history. [All of
the above quotes were taken from this book.]
I offer a quote from page 49 of this book.
“Modern Americans have long since forgotten the heated and sometimes violent debates which
took place in the thirteen colonies between 1775 and 1776 over the issue of morality. For many
thousands of Americans the big question of independence hung precariously on the single,
slender thread of whether or not the people were sufficiently “virtuous and moral” to govern
themselves. Self-government was generally referred to as “republicanism,” and it was universally
acknowledged that a corrupt and selfish people could never make the principles of republicanism
There is no doubt in my mind that the formation of the United States was guided by the hand of the
Creator of the Universe, a fact that some of the founders readily acknowledged.
We Americans need to seek the Lord for His assessment of our condition as a nation and respond to His
answer, just as Habakkuk stationed himself on the rampart to keep watch to see what the Lord would
speak to him and how he would reply when reproved (Habakkuk 2:1-3).
The Upward Call: #03-09152
by: Stuart H. Pouliot